On Monday, July 1, 2024, the Supreme Court will release its final opinions of the term, including one on whether former President Donald Trump can claim immunity from federal election subversion charges. The court is expected to address this case, along with two cases concerning social media and the First Amendment, and one dealing with bank transaction fees. The justices will then begin their summer recess.
Trump's Immunity Case
The most significant unresolved case concerns whether Trump is entitled to immunity from special counsel Jack Smith’s election subversion charges. This case could have major ramifications for Trump and future presidents. The central question is whether Trump's post-election actions were "official" or "private." If his actions were deemed "official," he would likely be granted immunity.
Social Media and the First Amendment
The Supreme Court will also rule on two cases involving the First Amendment and social media. These cases involve laws in Florida and Texas that aim to prevent social media platforms from suppressing conservative viewpoints. The laws prohibit these platforms from removing or demoting posts expressing certain opinions, including political content. Republican governors argue these laws are necessary to stop social media platforms from discriminating against conservatives. The central issue in these cases is whether curating posts is protected speech or if social media platforms are merely transmitting third-party posts.
Other Cases
The Supreme Court will also rule on a case concerning the fees banks can charge for debit card transactions. This case involves a North Dakota truck stop challenging these fees. The court will determine if the truck stop can sue, considering the six-year statute of limitations for challenging government regulations.
Controversies and a Leak
The court's term has been marked by controversies. Controversial flags were flown at properties owned by Justice Samuel Alito. An activist secretly recorded Alito and his wife, along with Chief Justice John Roberts. In a major breach of protocol, the court accidentally published a draft opinion in a significant abortion case.